William MacAskill is a very young Oxford professor of philosophy that introduces the reader to "longtermism" and "effective altruism". He challenges each of us to address the biggest challenges facing the human race for the sake of all future generations to come. He addresses the threat of collapse and extinction of civilization from nuclear war, climate change, asteroids, bioweapons and pandemics, and artificial intelligence. He describes the lasting impact of social values and norms through the example of slavery and describes the danger of locking in values. He suggests the we can do more than be just good citizens and good consumers and should take action to improve the future. He suggests that each individual should utilize their individual talents for maximum impact. "Beyond donations, three other personal decisions seem particularly high impact to me: political activism, spreading good ideas, and having children."
MacAskill loses me on the subject of population and I believe he downplays negative human behavior that has a lessor impact. I personally see over population as a major threat and have less concern about continued technological advancement. I also see a greater need to address the small stuff like plastics and work hard on spreading all good ideas. On the other hand, MacAskill walks the walk. He is a modest living vegetarian that donates a significant portion of his earnings and encourages others the do the same. I have shared the book with my son-in-laws and I do believe that we have a unique opportunity to help affect the lives of mankind for millennia to come.
Discussion questions:
1. What does the author mean by the title?
2. Who is the author's targeted reader? Why?
3. What can we do to help the future of mankind?
4. Why does the author encourage more children? Do you agree?
5. What is the author's take on religion and value setting?
6. Do you feel threatened by AI? AGI?
